Mercura vs IBM Sterling
VS
A Direct Comparison of CPQ Solutions
Compare features, flexibility, and costs — and see which solution fits best for modern manufacturing companies.
Many companies experience challenges with implementation time and complexity in IBM Sterling.
Comparison
Strategic Overview
Where does Mercura stand out?
- Fast deployment
- Flexible product configuration
- Lower dependency on consultancy projects
- Faster ROI
When does IBM Sterling make sense?
- Suitable for companies with large IT teams
- Deep Microsoft environments
- Longer implementation projects accepted
Direct comparison of Mercura and IBM Sterling
| Feature | Mercura | IBM Sterling |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native platform |  | Partial |
| Implementation time | Weeks | Often months |
| No-code / low-code rules | | Limited |
| Modern UI | | Older UI |
| ERP integration | Standard connectors | Often custom |
| Total cost transparency | | Varies |
| Scaling | High | Complex |
Price vs Total Cost
Economic Overview
Mercura
- Transparent SaaS model
- Fewer hidden costs
- Easier scaling over time
IBM Sterling
- Often implemented as larger consultancy projects
- Higher upfront costs
- More complex scaling
Customer Case
Valve Manufacturer
A Northern European manufacturer of industrial valves evaluated both Experlogix and Mercura as a CPQ solution.
After a test phase, the company chose Mercura because of:
- Faster implementation
- Better user experience for sales department
- Ability to continuously adjust rules themselves
Google Rating
5.0
G2 Rating
5.0
"We needed a CPQ solution that our business could continue working with without heavy consulting projects. That was crucial for our choice."
M
Technical Manager, Valve Manufacturer
Request a CPQ demo