Mercura vs Configure One Cloud
VS
A Direct Comparison of CPQ Solutions
Compare features, flexibility, and costs — and see which solution fits best for modern manufacturing companies.
Many companies experience challenges with implementation time and complexity in Configure One Cloud.
Comparison
Strategic Overview
Where does Mercura stand out?
- Fast deployment
- Flexible product configuration
- Lower dependency on consultancy projects
- Faster ROI
When does Configure One Cloud make sense?
- Suitable for companies with large IT teams
- Deep Microsoft environments
- Longer implementation projects accepted
Direct comparison of Mercura and Configure One Cloud
| Feature | Mercura | Configure One Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-native platform |  | Partial |
| Implementation time | Weeks | Often months |
| No-code / low-code rules | | Limited |
| Modern UI | | Older UI |
| ERP integration | Standard connectors | Often custom |
| Total cost transparency | | Varies |
| Scaling | High | Complex |
Price vs Total Cost
Economic Overview
Mercura
- Transparent SaaS model
- Fewer hidden costs
- Easier scaling over time
Configure One Cloud
- Often implemented as larger consultancy projects
- Higher upfront costs
- More complex scaling
Customer Case
Valve Manufacturer
A Northern European manufacturer of industrial valves evaluated both Experlogix and Mercura as a CPQ solution.
After a test phase, the company chose Mercura because of:
- Faster implementation
- Better user experience for sales department
- Ability to continuously adjust rules themselves
Google Rating
5.0
G2 Rating
5.0
"We needed a CPQ solution that our business could continue working with without heavy consulting projects. That was crucial for our choice."
M
Technical Manager, Valve Manufacturer
Request a CPQ demo